Asking for a third-party certification for your food products often leads to the same question for Indian manufacturers: Sedex, BRC or FSSC 22000? A brief answer to the Sedex vs BRC vs FSSC 22000 dilemma would be the fact that those certifications are aimed at solving different problems – Sedex certifies ethical and social compliance while BRC and FSSC 22000 certify food safety. Therefore, the most efficient thing you can do is to provide a certification that matches your buyer’s requests.
Sedex is a membership organisation offering its members a SMETA audit that deals with labour practices, health and safety, environmental and business ethics issues. In its turn, BRCGS and FSSC 22000 Foundation are the organisations offering GFSI-certified food safety programmes for production sites. The following guide aims at comparing all three certifications.
This guide is mostly informative in nature and offers some comparisons and key information on the issue to make up your mind about which certifications are worth obtaining.
What Are Sedex, BRC and FSSC 22000, Exactly?
Sedex is governed by the Sedex member organisation, BRCGS by BRCGS (Brand Reputation through Compliance), and FSSC 22000 by FSSC 22000 Foundation. All three of these systems are used by suppliers and food manufacturers to demonstrate compliance to a buyer, although they each certify completely different things.
Short Answer: Sedex (SMETA audit) is an ethics and social compliance programme, while BRC and FSSC 22000 are GFSI recognised food safety management systems.
A few things worth knowing upfront:
- Sedex is a membership program that uses SMETA (a Sedex Audit), which audits labor practices, health and safety, environment, and business ethics in the supply chain.
- BRCGS (previously BRC) is a food safety certification program for manufacturing plants that is founded on very stringent standards concerning safety and quality of products.
- The FSSC 22000 food safety management system is a food safety management system which is a combination of ISO 22000 and industry prerequisite programs of ISO/TS 22002 series.
- In the case of Indian food processing, exporting, and supplying companies, the choice ultimately lies in the buyer’s choice.
If you would like a deeper look at the food safety side, our guide on FSSC 22000 for Food Businesses breaks down how the standard works in practice.
Why Buyers Ask for Different Certifications
Buyers ask for different certifications because each one answers a different risk question about your factory.
- Food Safety Needs a Validated Benchmark
The GFSI validates food safety schemes, so that purchasers could rely on them interchangeably. Both BRC and FSSC 22000 have that endorsement, which is why retailers and private label purchasers use them.
- Ethical Sourcing is an Independent Requirement
Retailers and brands that audit their suppliers’ ethical sourcing focus on the issues such as working conditions, pay, working hours, employee welfare, and environmental footprint. Sedex and SMETA were developed to address these very issues.
- One Scheme Cannot Replace the Other
One company may be found compliant with SMETA audit in regards to its labor practices and at the same time not be compliant with FSSC 22000 in regards to food safety documentation. And vice versa – purchasers know this, and ask for the specific scheme.
- Purchasers Need Both More and More
Purchasers involved in food and agriculture manufacturing more and more frequently require both Sedex for their ethical sourcing and BRC/FSSC 22000 for food safety.
The Core Differences Between the Three Certifications
Here is where the differences actually show up, in practical terms.
Different Purposes and Scope
Sedex assesses labour, health and safety, environmental, and business ethics standards. BRC assesses HACCP, product safety, traceability, and site standards. FSSC 22000 assesses food safety management system, prerequisite programs, and food defence.
GFSI Recognition
BRCGS is approved by leading retailing groups in UK, Europe, and worldwide. FSSC 22000 is approved by leading retailing groups in Europe, North America, and Asia. As Sedex and SMETA are not GFSI-benchmarked, these can’t be used instead of BRC or FSSC 22000 for a buying organisation requiring a GFSI scheme.
Audit Period and Grading
SMETA audit is carried out annually or biennially, reporting results without pass/fail grades. BRC audit is an annual or ad hoc, grading as AA to D. FSSC 22000 performs annual surveillance audit, using minor/major non-conformities, and pass/not certified grade.
Documentation Requirement
Management System Documentation is not required by Sedex as it is audit-based. BRC needs a Food Safety Plan & HACCP, and FSSC 22000 requires complete ISO 22000 Documentation. Sedex requires low to medium level of paperwork whereas both the others carry a high burden.
Cost
Sedex Membership along with SMETA Audit usually costs ₹40,000 – ₹1,20,000 per year for an average-sized Indian Food Processing Factory. The BRCGS costs ₹1,50,000 – ₹4,00,000 and the FSSC 22000 costs ₹1,50,000 – ₹4,50,000 per year. The exact cost depends on the site size and Certification Body.
Ease and Speed of Certification
Sedex is easiest and fastest due to the fact that it audits based on what is there and not what has to be developed. Both BRC and FSSC 22000 require the development of efficient food safety management systems before any certification.
Corrective Actions
The time frame for Corrective Action is Site Specific and Buyer Driven in case of Sedex whereas it is defined according to Grade and Non-Conformity Type for BRC and Non-Conformity Classification for FSSC 22000.
Sedex vs BRC vs FSSC 22000: Quick Comparison
| Aspect | Sedex / SMETA | BRCGS | FSSC 22000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main focus | Ethical trade and social compliance | Food safety and quality | Food safety management system |
| GFSI-approved | No | Yes | Yes |
| Audit frequency and result | Every 2–3 years; findings reported, no pass/fail grade | Annual (unannounced options); graded AA to D | Annual surveillance audits; pass or not certified |
| Documentation burden | Low to moderate | High (HACCP, food safety plan) | High (ISO 22000 QMS, PRPs, HACCP) |
| Approximate annual cost (INR) | ₹40,000 – ₹1,20,000 | ₹1,50,000 – ₹4,00,000 | ₹1,50,000 – ₹4,50,000 |
| Ease of getting started | Easiest and fastest | Needs HACCP and system in place first | Needs full ISO 22000-based system |
What Does It Take to Get Each Certification Ready?
Readiness depends on whether you are building an ethics record or a full food safety system.
- Membership of Sedex and SMETA Audit – Become a member of Sedex and prepare your policies, records, and premises; verify whether the audit is a 2-pillar or 4-pillar audit.
- HACCP plan – mandatory requirement for BRC and FSSC 22000 and not auditable under Sedex.
- Documented food safety system – Food Safety Plan for BRC, and Documented Quality Management System for FSSC 22000 based on ISO 22000.
- Prerequisite Programs – included in BRC, and ISO/TS 22002-1 or Sector Specific PRPs for FSSC 22000.
- Accredited Certification Body – select the certified or licensed certification body for that particular standard, BRCGS accredited body, or FSSC 22000 licensed body.
- Gap analysis prior to the audit – check whether gap analysis is included in the quote or not, as it prevents major non-conformities.
For a full breakdown of what auditors check on the ethical side, see our Complete SMETA Audit Checklist.
Common Mistakes Food Manufacturers Make When Choosing a Certification
- Given that Sedex may be used to replace BRC or FSSC 22000. Since Sedex is not GFSI benchmarked and does not measure food safety, then the GFSI buyer would still require BRC or FSSC 22000.
- Selecting a program before knowing the buyer requirements. Start from the buyer’s requirements and choose BRC over FSSC 22000 only where the buyer or market specifically requires it.
- Starting the process after making it a contractual obligation. Document preparation, HACCP planning and prerequisites take longer than expected to develop.
- Avoiding a gap analysis. Carrying out a gap analysis prior to buyer requirements helps in saving time and cost due to re-auditing and addressing deficiencies.
- Neglecting to check the auditor’s accreditation and scope. Verify that the certification organization is accredited for your particular standard. Verify the time frame for conducting an audit at your particular location and product lines.
When Each Certification Makes the Most Sense
- Select Sedex if the client is demanding transparency in ethical trading or if he/she works only with retailers requiring SMETA members.
- Select FSSC 22000 if you manufacture or process food products and want a recognized GFSI certification for food safety.
- Select BRC in case there is any particular buyer or market which requires BRC in preference to FSSC 22000.
- Select Sedex as well as BRC or FSSC 22000 in case the buyer demands evidence of ethical sourcing and food safety which is increasingly becoming common in large retail and exporting contracts.
- Switch to BRC or FSSC 22000 if you begin catering to retailers, foodservice chains or export markets requiring GFSI recognition or private label contracts.
It matters less while you sell only in the domestic market, where FSSAI certification and a solid HACCP understanding are the usual starting point, but building your documentation early still makes the later steps easier.
Key Takeaways
- Sedex is an ethics and social compliance system, whereas BRC and FSSC 22000 are food safety management systems.
- BRC and FSSC 22000 are GFSI-certified, and Sedex can never be used in lieu of either for food safety compliance.
- Sedex is the cheapest and fastest option, and FSSC 22000 requires the most documents.
- Customers nowadays demand Sedex along with BRC or FSSC 22000, not one at the expense of the other.
- Your customer makes the decision: food safety requirements suggest BRC or FSSC 22000, and ethical trade requirements suggest Sedex.
- Gap analysis before any buyer’s deadline avoids extra audit costs.
Conclusion
Sedex vs BRC vs FSSC 22000: once we distinguish between ethics and food safety, the choice becomes clear. Sedex is your quickest and cheapest way to get your proof of ethical trading in order, and BRC and FSSC 22000 are your food safety certification recognized by GFSI and needed by export and retail buyers. Buyers want both more and more often, so something that was a bonus before has become a must-have. Contact Legal4Sure for the perfect certification for your buyers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Sedex, BRC and FSSC 22000?
Sedex stands for ethical and social compliance while BRC and FSSC 22000 stand for GFSI approved food safety management systems.
Which one do buyers prefer?
Buyers are now showing preference for Sedex along with BRC or FSSC 22000 where Sedex covers ethical sourcing and BRC or FSSC 22000 covers food safety.
Can I hold both Sedex and a food safety certification?
Yes. Many exporters have Sedex along with either BRC or FSSC 22000 as these schemes are for different compliance purposes.
Which is cheaper, Sedex or FSSC 22000?
Sedex is relatively inexpensive at ₹40,000 – ₹1,20,000 per annum while BRC and FSSC 22000 will cost ₹1,50,000 – ₹4,50,000 per annum.
Which certification is easiest to get?
Sedex/SMETA is easy and faster because it audits your existing system.
Should I get Sedex or FSSC 22000?
Opt for Sedex when buyers conduct an audit for ethical trade and go for FSSC 22000 when you require a recognized food safety certificate.
Which certification is better for exporters?
Exporters who have GFSI buyers should go for BRC or FSSC 22000 and for those who have ethical audits Sedex is a requirement.

